Registration of new members is currently closed. Guestbook opened for now.  Guests who have questions may post at our guestbook.  No lengthy debates please. Kindly note: MV is a place for serious learning through mutual consultation where we have zero tolerance for trouble-makers, narcissists and needless disputants. We simply stand for what is compatible with the Noble Quran regardless of titles such as "traditionalism" or "modernism." We have the right to our opinion just as you have the right to yours. All disagreements must be left at that. Final Judgement belongs to The Almighty.
MUSLIM VILLA - QURAN ONLY
March 28, 2024, 03:49:21 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Imran Khan - the classic hypocrite

+-
Shoutbox
November 01, 2023, 03:44:32 pm Zainab_M: Allahhuma ameen .. ameen.
November 01, 2023, 03:43:43 pm Ruhi_Rose: Yes .. making lots of dua everyday ..... watching those real life video clips, my face feels wet with tears all the time.  May ALLAH grant the best to these wonderful, brave & steadfast martyrs,  Ameen ya Allah.
November 01, 2023, 03:38:26 pm Zainab_M: Keep praying, praying a lot for Gaza. It's worse than a prison .. it's a concentration camp.  Children as young as 10 or 11 are having to care for their younger siblings ages 2, 3 and 4 becoz many have lost both parents.  It's a very, very, very tearful situation there.
October 26, 2023, 03:40:19 pm N. Truth Seeker: Don't forget to look up MV Blog Zainab's Lounge for our Gaza updates.
October 20, 2023, 04:24:44 pm Zainab_M: Right sister Heba.  Gaza hospital bombing has the fingerprints of Israel all over it.  For Israel this is no big crime.  They have done this and much worse many times in the past and intend to do the same and worse many more times in near future.
October 20, 2023, 04:20:20 pm Heba E. Husseyn: Catching Zionist lies isn't hard. Soon after Gaza hospital bombing killing and maiming hundreds, Israel was quick to accuse Islamic Jihad of a misfired rocket.  That didn't sound plausible because IJ does not have such sophisticated bombing devices.  Zionist lie was fully exposed when anglican archbishop of Jerusalem,Hosam Naoum,  said today that 3 or 4 days prior to boming Israel had warned Gaza hospital to evacuate. Yet CIA claims in its flawed analysis that the rocket did not come from Israel.  But conveniently does not explain how Israel could have known 4 days earlier that a "misfired" rocket from IJ was coming.  Yet on the basis of this flawed & bias analysis of CIA, Biden is comforting Israel he believes Israel didn't do that war crimes bombing.
July 29, 2023, 03:02:07 am Zainab_M: Yesterday was Ashura, Muharram 10, 1444 (July 27, 2023).  Read about this very tragic day and details of the world's greatest 7th century revolutionary: WHO WAS HUSSEIN.
June 28, 2023, 09:48:39 am Zainab_M: Walaikum As Salaam.  This was the first Hajj open to all after the pandemic. It was attended by 2.6 million Muslims.
View Shout History
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Imran Khan - the classic hypocrite  (Read 3522 times)
0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.
Ruhi_Rose
TEAM MUSLIM VILLA The Avid Reader | Mom of 3 cute rascals
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6287



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« on: December 10, 2008, 12:59:41 am »




'Mick Jaggers' of Pakistan


It's no secret that throughout his incredibly unsuccessful political career, Mr. Imran Khan Niazi had always referred to and looked upon Benazir Bhutto as an enemy with never a positive word for her (and neither did she deserve it).  In 1996 when there was a minor explosion somewhere within the premises of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital in Lahore (which was widely suspected to have been orchestrated by the TI Party itself to draw some attention), Benazir Bhutto who was then the PM paid a visit to the Hospital to express sympathy.  But Khan's political hatred of her was so intense that he refused to be present at the Shaukat Khanum Hospital to receive the PM.  Even the critics of Bhutto were shocked at Khan's needless arrogance.  
 
It was only after the assasination of Bhutto that his tone changed with a bundle of lies and a selfish motive, of course.  It became his new weapon against the then government.  
 
"I have known Benazir since we were in Oxford together, but we have drifted apart politically since then."  Imran Khan -
Hizb-ut-Tahrir UK


Khan tries to dupe the younger generation of Pakistanis into thinking that he and Bhotto were childhood friends and colleagues sharing a common goal of becoming politicians since their days at "Oxford together."  Of course, nothing could be further from the truth.  Whenever Khan was at Oxford, no one even knew who he was then.  Bhutto and Khan were never friends, neither within nor outside Oxford.  Neither they nor their families even knew each other.  Moreover, while Bhutto was into politics from a very young age, Khan became a politician when he was middle aged, much after his retirement from cricket in the early 1990s.  Prior to that, he had nothing to do with politics and knew nothing of it (which he still doesn't).  They never shared the same goal at Oxford.

"Talking about Benazir, Imran said she was braver than most men he knew. “Benazir was deeply touched by her father, Zulfikar Bhutto’s hanging, she became stronger for that and feared nothing. She knew that her life was under threat. A person with any lesser courage would not have gone into the public the way she did,” he said. - Imran Khan - Pakistan Defence Forum quoting Khan's statements he made while vacationing in Mumbai at the time of Bhutto's assasination."

Khan mentions that her father's death "touched" Bhutto "deeply."  How does he know that?  He never even knew Bhutto nor her family.   Not to mention, the most glaring fact about Benazir Bhutto was that from the time she became PM in 1988, she had diverted drastically from her father's policies, both domestic and global.  Bhutto herself stated in a television interview soon after coming to power that though she admired her father's ability to govern, at the end of the day "we all have our own different views .."   Bhutto surely was "touched", in that, her instincts for massive corruption were sharpened.  Little wonder that after her ouster in 1997, she and her husband were picked as the world's most corrupt couple who, according to very conservative estimates, amassed assets worth nothing less than 5 billion U.S. dollars from the Pakistani tax payers' money.  According to more flexible estimates, that figure spikes by as much as eleven billion dollars!  And stealing from the Pakistani tax payers would mean stealing from the poor.  Let's not forget, in feudal Pakistan, only the poor pay tax, not the rich.  Have you ever thought why in Pakisan a politician never lashes out at the 'money making machine' of another politician?  That's because they are all birds of a feather ....
 
Did Khan really mean that Bhutto feared nothing and was "braver than most men I knew"?  Whether or not he meant it, his words were dead wrong.  Bhutto feared plenty. She particularly feared the pending corruption cases against her being re-opened.  Unlike her brave brother who was murdered at the behest of her wheeler-dealer husband with Bhutto's approval, she was horrified spending time in jail.  Participating in public rallies after her return to Pakistan in 2007 had nothing to do with "bravery."  Firstly, her close advisers did little to make her understand how much Pakistan had changed since 1987 till 2007.  But to be more truthful, Bhutto's lack of security concern came primarily from herself, not from Musharaf, whom Khan perpetually blames for purely selfish reasons.  Referring to Bhutto's death as an act of "bravery" is an affront to this gallant quality.  It was simply Bhutto's infamous greed for power, fame and money that made her unrealistically confident and foolhardy to perceive the dangers of militancy.  Twelve years prior to her assasination, she approved the assasination of her brother because he didn't agree with her unprincipled stance.  In December 2007, someone else ordered her assasination because they didn't agree with her stance.  What goes around comes around .. those who live by the sword, die by the sword.  
 
It's interesting to read that though Khan mentions that Bhutto was "braver than most men I knew," his ex-wife writes much the opposite in the Telegraph saying "What Benazir lacked was political bravery."  

In an interview with Amy Goodman at Democracy Now dated January 2008, she asked him his views why Bhutto was willing to work with Musharaf and the U.S.  Khan's statement was " .. she needed the US, and she needed Musharraf. The reason, in my opinion and in fact opinion of most people in Pakistan, she needed them because she was stuck in corruption cases, Switzerland and in Spain, and she needed Musharraf to be on her side so that the Pakistan government would not pursue these corruption cases."  But also, in the same interview he refers to her assasination as "very significant because she represented one of the two major parties" though "I did not agree with her tactics."  But he never explained his own contradiction as to how the death of such a famously corrupt politician becomes "significant" for the country.  Was it a superficial significance of losing a political 'celebrity' of sorts or significant for bringing a ray of hope in a country she ruthlessly robbed?   Knowing the confused state of Khan's mind, it's anyone's guess when a critisizm might be twisted into some absurd compliment or vice-versa.

And a bit more on the hypocrisy of this man who claims to be a Pakistani 'nationalist' ..

On December 29th 2007, an Indian newspaper reported:
 
"Imran Khan chills out in Mumbai -  Pakistan may be on the boil following the assassination of former premier Benazir Bhutto , yet cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan finds time to relax.  Imran is in Mumbai on a personal visit.  Imran, at a press conference in Mumbai, had expressed concerns that 'people have lost faith' in Musharraf and 'nobody is safe in Pakistan.  Who will now address a political rally? Who will come to attend the rally? A recent survey said 80 per cent of the Pakistani people want Musharraf to step down but he refuses to leave his post,' he had said."

I guess, one would need to be some kind of 'nationalist' to say this about one's own country in purely enemy territory.  Being a regular visitor to India for spending time within the elite circles of his Hindu friends in Mumbai (the wealthy business community or the bollywooders), he also shocked many Pakistanis when a few years prior to December 2007, he told the Indian press that he "envied" Indian democracy.  Critisizing your country on your own soil is one thing.  Doing that while visiting an enemy country is quite another story.  In Musharaf's time various Pakistani media, including Geo TV, frequently came up with scathing critisizm of his government.  Yet, it's mind boggling why Khan needed to rush to India to deride his country.


Express India
wrote.

"Praising India on the development front, Khan said he envied the country's democratic institution and hoped that Pakistan too would have an independent Election Commission.
Khan showered praises on India's judicial system .."  


Regardless of his perception being right or wrong - and it was definitely WRONG as India is an occupying state with a hardcore, bigoted Hindu leadership which is far away from democracy -  it's just so astonishing that a so-called patriotic Pakistani who has babbled much about his loyalty to his country speaks as such on Indian soil in November 2004, only two years after the horrific Gujarat massacre that killed 5,000 Muslims, an act of state sponsored terror planned by the then chief minister of that province, N. Modi.  It probably exposes Khan's distorted ideas of democracy and judicial system which he would love to implement, should he ever (God forbid) grab the reins of power in impoverished Pakistan that has had more than her share of suffering.  

It's indeed a relief that by the Grace and Mercy of Allah Almighty, Mr. Khan is a doomed politician with little money, almost no public support and destined never to succeed.  Even the simple minds of the Pakistani masses who have always been so apathetic and forgiving towards the country's most wily politicians have not been able to ignore Khan's gross double standards and inconsistencies sprouting from his very muddled and childishly calculating thoughts.

Now, after Musharaf has stepped down and Khan is still rotting in square one ..  the song he's singing against the present government is that they're trying to shield Musharaf by not reinstating the judges.  
 
Someone I know had once referred to Pakistan as the 'world's little prostitute.'  Oh! so true !! Pakistani politics isn't about serving Pakistan.  It's about castes, unions, lawyers, bribery and maximum manipulation.  It's next to impossible for a decent human being to cope with.  You need to think like a scumbag, play your cards like a scumbag, and yet somehow appear like a saint in public eyes.  The imperialistic powers are only enjoying this big mess that serves their interest better by the day.



And now, don't forget to scroll down to read on this thread: IMRAN KHAN - HYPOCRISY AND SELECTIVE MORALS


Related posts:

Bushra Bibi, the backward aging marvel
Imran Khan, a jealous collaborator or the odd one out?



Addendum July 2022



Khan jeered Sharif saying India treated him like a "schoolboy" as reported by Indian media which loves traitors like Sharif and Khan.  But Khan's concept of correcting Sharif's act of treachery was not by acting the opposite, rather by competing with Sharif and meeting the same enemy.   And when Khan met this Hindu bigot and mass murderer who orchestrated the Gujarat riot killing over 5,000 Muslims, Khan claimed he never felt more comfortable with any other leader.  Will these piss-pots ever hang their heads in shame?
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Zainab_M
TEAM MV Founder
Admin
Hero Member
*
Posts: 6318



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2008, 02:00:07 am »



Excellent observation, sister Ruhi.  This man's behavior is just as weird as his striking old age resemblance to Mick Jagger.  Mr. Khan's rantings against Benazir and her husband on their corruption was loud and frequent, and very correct.  And now he compliments her by stating "Benazir was deeply touched by her father, Zulfikar Bhutto’s hanging, she became stronger .."  Does he mean that her father's hanging made her embrace the politics of corruption as a rebound?  .. because corruption was the only thing both her governments were famous for.  That much we all know for sure.

Now, here's an interesting comment I read in the Dawn Blog posted by a guest.

Quote -----

Imagine if Imran Khan 'Nazi' became PM of Pakistan:

1)  Javed Miandad will be deported from Pakistan.
2)  Qasim Omar will be in Jail.
3)  Saeed Anwar will be banned from participating in any activities.
4)  No cricket match will be held in Karachi.
5)  Shoaib Mohammad, Moin-ul-Atique, Asif Mujtaba and Gulam Ali will not be allowed to watch cricket matches.
6)  Mansoor Akhtar will be made chief minister of Sindh.
7)  Abdul Qadir will be chief minsiter of Punjab.
8)  Mohd Younis (ex Imran friend) will be minster of old (baba) cricketers.
9)   Saleem Jaffer will be chairmian of cricket board.
10) Sarfraz Nawaz will be under house arrest.
11) Finally, Miandad will be sentenced to death.

Unquote -----

LOL - this left me in splits .. even though I don't recognize the names of most of the people mentioned above.  It's an interesting sarcasm hurled at Khan's ignorant hypocrisy.


Report Spam   Logged

Heba E. Husseyn
TEAM MUSLIM VILLA Villa Artisan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4971



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2008, 02:06:12 am »



Mick Jagger?  ha ha 😅

These buggers sound like a bunch of cads ..
Report Spam   Logged

Ruhi_Rose
TEAM MUSLIM VILLA The Avid Reader | Mom of 3 cute rascals
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6287



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2008, 07:04:31 am »



lol - Sis Zainab, that's hilarious!   Sis Heba, "cad" is an understatement ..
Report Spam   Logged

N. Truth Seeker
Quiet guy technology nerd | TEAM MUSLIM VILLA
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4347



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2008, 11:17:23 pm »



Yes, this is very a hypocritical move.  Though I don't know a huge lot about Pakistani politics, but knowing Indian Hindu bigotry and repression of rights of minorities in India, worst of all the brutal Indian occupation of Kashmir, Pakistani leaders behaving like this .. much worse than just shamelessness.  Cunning, selfish wretches!
Report Spam   Logged

Zainab_M
TEAM MV Founder
Admin
Hero Member
*
Posts: 6318



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2009, 09:37:16 pm »

Little more to spill the beans ..


IMRAN KHAN - HYPOCRISY AND SELECTIVE MORALS

Mr. I.Khan's popularity might be more among Pakistanis outside of Pakistan than within. The reason being, it's easier to get a closer look from within that turns fantasy to fact. However, let's face it. The only reason why Mr.Khan gets even the scant support that we sometimes see is because he is as yet untested. It's a similar euphoria (on a much lesser scale of course) that surrounded Benazir Bhutto when she came to Pakistan in 1987. But once these guys are put to the test (i.e. elected and acquire power), they all prove to be of the same lot. Everyone talks big prior to coming in power yet no one has refrained to show their true colors after acquiring power. Mr. I. Khan is absolutely no exception.

Those who are singing that old number titled "I don't doubt Imran's sincerity .." ought to know that this guy is the only politician who couldn't restrain showing his true colors even before he could get the smell of power. Apart from his well-known autocracy that's led to the miserable centralization of the TI party, during the elections of 1997 his nomination papers came under intense scrutiny (almost rejected) when he was caught of massive tax evasion and making false statements. When asked to declare his assets, the staggering response from Mr. IK was that he had "no assets." When told to declare his wife's jewellery, the appaling reply was that she had "nothing" of that. Prior to contesting the 1997 polls, he gave a statement that set everyone's head spinning like a top when he uttered a FALSE concept that men are to enjoy greater social freedom than women according to "Islam."

Khan's problems of tax evasion and male chauvinism are pretty notorious that don't even require a debate. Like all politicians, there are various other ethical violations graciously exhibited by Mr. Khan during this period and beyond that are needless to mention.

We've reached an era when corruption is legalized 'behind the veil' in all political circles of Pakistan .. to an extent that the Pakistani media doesn't even find the stories on corruption to be sensational any longer. But all this doesn't change the fact that the malignancy of rampant corruption, double-talk and political arrogance has brought Pakistan into her terminal stages. The only way out is to liberate our minds from misguided fantasies and make these cut-throat leaders realize that Pakistan is nobody's kingdom. If we are to be prosecuted for not paying our taxes, so must they. It's pathetic that such justice is a luxury in Pakistan, and still more pathetic that the 'Justice' Party plans to bring justice to no one. 

I wouldn't even talk of Zardari.  But as for Musharaf's era,  I admit 'Mushocracy' wasn't as pleasing as Democracy but it was preferable to 'Idiosyncrasy' and 'Kleptocracy' which are the prime reasons for seeing a ravaged Pakistan at present.

Another truth about this man is his deep link with the Jewish community of UK. Thus, it's a common joke that each time he arranges a demo etc., they ask "what kinda money is he using now, hard-earned money or Jewish money?"

Lack of experience is not the only shortcoming of Khan, rather it's one of the many .. frilled with an amazing shortage of common sense.  But experience put aside, Mr. Khan's false statements exposing his heartfelt tendencies to cheat as an insignificant politician (only God knows what sort of rampage this man will go on if he ever becomes PM) is not about experience. It's about mindset.  It's true that Khan had no experience back in the early 90s, so he lied like a fool then. Comparatively he's a bit more experienced as a double-talk fraud now, so he'll make sure he lies a little more intelligently. But the 'experience' and 'intelligence' of Pakistani politicians are not meant to benefit the masses. These 'intelligent' minds only develop to get personified into a type of intellectual evil. The experience that builds up with time is only constructed with the help of this evil. And please don't ask for any "references" on these. We've got 61 years of history screaming at us that mere 'cheerleader' optimism without the support of realism is totally futile.

Khan and his small group of supporters also claim that their rivals are constantly using his personal life against him.  That's a joke!  Frankly, the people of Pakistan have enough woes of their own already. They couldn't give a rat's tail for this old man's secret rendezvous.

Since the early 1990s till to date, poor Khan's pathetically centralized TI party hasn't budged an inch ahead of square one.  Even after almost two decades, here's how the fantasy goes ---- Pakistan was a country at the brink of a disaster. There was no one competent enough to save her. Then came the great Khan like an angel of justice to rescue  the drowning Ark.  Was the goal of this 'angel of justice' to become the head of the state? Does that insinuate he is unable to bring any improvements unless he becomes head of the state? Perhaps yes, to some extent .. but only to an extent. Reforms and justice aren't simply introduced through the force of power. But the much greater part of that spreads through ideologies.

Unfortunately for the 'angel of justice' he has little support to become head of the state. Not in the near future. Perhaps never in his lifetime. But that shouldn't deter him from continuing his quest for 'justice' and I'm sure that's precisely what he claims. As I already said, introduction of new ideas in the minds of people by the wisdom of competent leaders is the secret of a social revolution, not power.   It's realized when they do their best to promote the ideology they truly believe in, based on the voice of their conscience. Thus, as an "idealist" nothing should really be a hurdle for Khan to speak up for justice. Khan needs to show strong support for his values on the streets. Has he walked the streets? Certainly he has. But in how many of those demos he organized did he demand justice directly for the people? I'm not talking about demos organized by paying money to students and villagers shouting slogans against the government. These are specifically for him not the people. There's a marked difference between the two.

As anyone would know, the social system in Pakistan has numerous drawbacks with many root causes for injustice .. two of the most deplorable of all being the prevalence of the feudal system and the situation of women.

Hand in hand with corruption .. non-payment of agricultural tax in feudal Pakistan, a country that's 80% agricultural, is hugely responsible for crippling the country's economy and subsequently suffering of the middle-class and poor. Besides this, it has introduced slavery and child labor in the rural areas of the entire country. This is even more shameful than the standard poverty we see throughout the third world at large. What words has Khan uttered as yet inside and outside the Parliament to discontinue the feudal system and imposition of taxes on the rich for the benefit of the poor?   A lone supporter of Khan once stated that Khan (who's himself a feudal) has spoken on the importance of abolition of the feudal system in Pakistan in an interview in India.  Ah! In India again.  Why always in India?  But that's no good.  He needs to speak of this at the Parliament in Islamabad, not in India nor in TV and radio interviews anywhere outside the country.  But oh! I forgot.  He's an idealist so he just speaks when there are no chances of it for being realized.  Abolishing feudalism is beyond the bounds of the Judiciary in Pakistan.  It has to be tackled at the Parliament with a majority bill.

I realize Khan has no support nor influence in the Parliament.  In 18 years, all he's managed to acquire is one rickety seat only for himself.  But like I've stated earlier, its the intent that displays one's sincerity despite lack of support.  So, even if he has no backing, he does have a tongue in his mouth to speak about land reforms or simply the introduction of some revenue from the wealthy feudals.

The discriminatory culture toward women is just too rampant to describe. Some of the most shocking laws against women in Pakistan today are:
(1) Divorce rules that favor men entirely, in that, men are not obligated to give even a nickel to their divorced wives as compensation - a practice totally against the ethics and dictates of the Noble Quran.
(2) A glaringly anti-Quranic law where women are expected to pay the entire dowry instead of men taking up this obligation totally. It's led to the commercialization of the institution of marriage in the most deplorable ways and awful financial pressure on women and their families.
(3) Another strikingly un-Quranic law introduced by the clergy in the name of Sharia that prevails high & mighty in Pakistan is accusing women of adultery with a jail term who are actually suffering the trauma of rape or even gang rape.

Why hasn't the 'angel of justice' spoken a single word against any to the above mentioned injustices? When innocent women like Mukhtarmai, Shehzia Khaleed and Sonya Naz were raped and tortured by their attackers and Musharaf's government did little or nothing to help them .. rather increased their anxiety by not punishing the rapists and preventing these women from speaking to the press .. where was the 'angel of justice' who came sweeping into Pakistan's political arena? I realize he is not in a position to dispense justice. But he is in a position to speak up for it. When Asma Jehangir, with several of her colleagues of both genders, was out on the streets screaming for justice and fairplay, where was the 'angel of justice?' Perhaps busy making a deal with Musharaf at the time, so the cries for justice by these people took the back seat for him. Or perhaps it was simply Khan's well-known anti-feminism that made him disregard such injustice to women.

One may ask: Have the other leaders ever spoken at such times? Of course not. They made it clear long before Khan arrived in the picture that they're rogue leaders and not interested in delievering anything. Thus, we need to count on the person who stated he's different from the rest. Surely that ought to go beyond a little philanthropy of building a couple of hospitals and a college.

It's also hard not to observe that like his political colleagues, Khan has never talked in support of true & recognized deliverers of justice. None of them have spoken a word in support of Abdel Satar Edhi, an angelic soul in the true sense of the term who has earned unprecedented admiration and praise all around the world for his charitable spirit, generosity and dedication. Edhi has been harassed and hounded by all governments prior to Musharaf out of sheer jealousy of his impeccable reputation. Khan doesn't seem to mind their actions at all.

The only positive aspect that's proliferating in the Pakistani society is that the people have made it clear through unspoken words that their silence doesn't mean they're dumb. Much of that is reflected in the unusually low turnouts during polls and Khan's stagnated popularity along with his 'stalwart' colleagues.

The hypocrisy of demagogues is easier to read than they anticipate.
Report Spam   Logged

N. Truth Seeker
Quiet guy technology nerd | TEAM MUSLIM VILLA
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4347



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2009, 11:19:34 pm »



Truly selective .... abominable morals !!
Report Spam   Logged

MuslimanMahlon
Allah suffices
Full Member
***
Posts: 142




Badges: (View All)
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2011, 04:26:14 am »

lol @ the Mick Jagger reference.

I knew politics in Pakistan were bad but man... Women pay dowry?! Astaghfirullah!
Report Spam   Logged

“Truth always rests with the minority, and the minority is always stronger than the majority, because the minority is generally formed by those who really have an opinion, while the strength of a majority is illusory, formed by the gangs who have no opinion — and who, therefore, in the next instant (when it is evident that the minority is the stronger) assume its opinion… while truth again reverts to a new minority.”

Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
muslima
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 556



Badges: (View All)
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2013, 06:29:08 pm »

 salamem

I Hope everyone doing good ,inshAllah ??

I was looking for it brilliant great exposure of mr khan's dual personality , hypocrisy and failure's of his political career ,interesting !! Bhutto episode is also very appreciating ,mr khan himself a tsunami for pakistan , Allah knows what mr khan wants  , he is misleading youth, yesterday i have recived a video of his jalsa in pishawar , pakistan ..which exposes his true face and left a big question mark I would like to share ...


I hope these links work ..

  Shocked


تکبر سے لبریزعمران خان نے اپنے غلاموں کے بال نوچ لئے

http://www.frequency.com/video/x/83302063



http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151543421162209&set=vb.108800099218551&type=2&theater



leader should not behave like that ! Mr khan lost his temper very bad ... Isn't  worse he is talking about change and no change in his rude nature ??

Report Spam   Logged

Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is a promise which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. Who fulfilleth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice then in your bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.9:111
muslima
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 556



Badges: (View All)
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2013, 06:33:16 pm »

Yeah brother, can u imagine the hypocrisy?  These buggers talk big about being believers but when it comes down to practicing our beautiful Faith, they never do that.  Just talk and very selective action.  Allah, The Almighty, will deal with them on the Day of Judgment.  The Noble Quran has made it crystal clear that all marriage expenses must be met by the husband (to whatever extent he can afford, of course).  But even if he can afford not more than $10, he isn't entitled to request his future wife to pay anything, let alone coerce her or her family for a big dowry.  These so-called male Muslims of Pakistan have learned these awful customs from the hindus of India, and just because it suits their selfish interest, they implement it, forgetting the dictates of the Noble Quran forbidding it.  In many Pakistani families marriage has become a commercial transaction with the groom's family literally ripping off the poor bride's father.  Disgusting!

Agree with ur point sis , correct pakistan have deep impact of india , pakistan adopt all bidah's and cheap culture , customs, traditions,  from hindus which Noble Quran forbidding but sadly this shameless, double standard nation have no self respect. Angry
Report Spam   Logged

Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is a promise which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. Who fulfilleth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice then in your bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.9:111
Zainab_M
TEAM MV Founder
Admin
Hero Member
*
Posts: 6318



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2013, 02:13:56 am »



You're absolutely right sis.  Many Pakistanis love to identify themselves with the indian Hindu culture.  It's a big, big shame to say the least!  As for Khan, I've always hated him.  He's just as big a hypocrite as Bhutto was or Sharif is.  I didn't see the whole of this video but yes, he's got a very bad temper and has often engaged in rude behavior and arguments.  He will only multiply the problems of Pakistan, not solve them.  As one analyst rightly said, he claims he will change the system but actually it is the system that is changing him.  
Report Spam   Logged

muslima
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 556



Badges: (View All)
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2013, 06:14:35 am »

 Thumbsup

sharif's should have change their names roguish, robbers  Grin

corrupt  nation , corrupt leaders.. they have destroyed the beautiful country.. Sad

I too don't like him at all .It's less then a min video clip showing his arrogance and level of anger .He got frustrated  ,he pull the guy with his hairs who's standing there and not sitting as khan were saying ,sit down ! it's bad attitude ,this is not the way to deal with any one .. grumpy  , he quote caliphs and their establishments ect several time ,to fooled youth ,they must ask him now is this his knowledge about caliphs character , their patience and tolerance .. such a shame, another Immoral , ignorant candidate for the post of prime minister ...

Report Spam   Logged

Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is a promise which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. Who fulfilleth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice then in your bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.9:111
Zainab_M
TEAM MV Founder
Admin
Hero Member
*
Posts: 6318



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2013, 01:38:07 am »



Ha ha ha .... yes, Sharif is just as bad.  That's the big problem in Pakistan at present - no leadership at all.  They're all the same.  A few days ago former president Pervez Musharaf arrived in Karachi.  Let's see if he has anything worthwhile to offer.  But even if he does, he cannot win an election.  In Pakistan 2 things are necessary to win - money and US support.   I don't know if Musharaf has any US support right now but he surely has no money to fight an election against those wealthy zamindars and industrialists. Furthermore, many Pakistanis are so wily-dumb, they seem to prefer deceit over sincerity. 
Report Spam   Logged

Heba E. Husseyn
TEAM MUSLIM VILLA Villa Artisan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4971



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2013, 01:46:02 am »



If only these guys were as interested in the welfare of Pakistan as they are in getting hair transplants and shaking hands with the bigoted enemy ..
Report Spam   Logged

N. Truth Seeker
Quiet guy technology nerd | TEAM MUSLIM VILLA
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4347



WWW
Badges: (View All)
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2013, 01:47:27 am »



Spot on point, Sister Heba
Report Spam   Logged


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Scammers & spammers will be reported | © If you borrow MV contents you must mention our link with hypertext | MV Team is not responsible for comments by members or guests.
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy