Yes! Hadith has corrupted Islam

[Zainab_M]

From QB Wordpress blog [grammar edited slightly for readers' convenience]

Efforts began being made to corrupt Islam during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad when the hypocrites started spreading lies and misinformation during his lifetime. These people who invented lies were the enemies of God Almighty and the Prophet.   Their fabricated stories were very systematically spread  among the people who had never met or seen Prophet.

The distortion continued and gathered 'momentum' with the popping up of the hadith culture 200 years after the death of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).   Thus, corruption of Islam became more rampant.

The criteria for collection of these hadiths adopted by Bukhari and other hadith writers was very illogical and faulty which resulted in very confusing illogical unscientific stories falsely attributed to Prophet Muhammad. The hadith writers really did not read the message of Qur’an before they started writing the sayings of Prophet Muhammad.

The only criteria to judge the authenticy of hadiths was to verify the chain of transmitters of Prophet Muhammad's time which is considered by Sunnis to be "science" of collecting hadiths referred to as “Ilm al Rajal” or “Isma Al Rajal” knowledge of people.  Shias reject almost all Sunni hadiths and they have their hadiths which were written 450 years after Prophet Muhammad's death.   Source of Sunni hadiths are supposed to be the "companions" of Prophet Muhammad and his family and Shia hadiths are based on Ahl e Bait (House of Prophet Muhammad) which only includes Prophet’s daughter Fatima, Prophet cousin Ali who was also the hushand of Fatima and their two sons Hassan and Hussein.

The God Almighty has promised to protect the message of Qur’an till the Day of Judgement is the only criteria we need to judge the authenticity of these fabricated stories written by majority of non Arabs so called Imams. Following is the verse which provide the proof that not all of the companions during Prophet Muhammad's time were true believers.

And among those around you of the wandering Arabs there are hypocrites, and among the townspeople of Al-Madinah (there are some who) persist in hypocrisy whom thou (O Muhammad) knowest not. We, We know them, and We shall chastise them twice; then they will be relegated to a painful doom. 9:101

The following is the verse which provides the proof that these hypocrites were spreading lies and misinformation attributing it to Prophet Muhammad.

O Messenger! Let not them grieve thee who vie one with another in the race to disbelief, of such as say with their mouths: "We believe," but their hearts believe not, and of the Jews: listeners for the sake of falsehood, listeners on behalf of other folk who come not unto thee, changing words from their context and saying: If this be given unto you, receive it, but if this be not given unto you, then beware! He whom Allah doometh unto sin, thou (by thine efforts) wilt avail him naught against Allah. Those are they for whom the Will of Allah is that He cleanse not their hearts. Theirs in the world will be ignominy, and in the Hereafter an awful doom;   5:41

The logical conclusion here is that if the hadith writers in fact traced back the chain of transmitters back to Prophet Muhammad's time, then the lies and misinformation could not become the truth. The hadith writers criteria was what we call it “garbage in, garbage out” in data processing terminology. The hadith writers are called Imams and no criticism is allowed as it will be considered blesphemy making that person an 'apostate.' The punishment for apostacy according to these fabricated corrupted hadiths is “death”.  

The other argument the Sunnis and Shiias bring into discussion is that the Qur’an cannot be understood without the help of hadiths. The hadiths creates doubts about the message that some of the verses of Qur’an are missing and Shiias believe that complete message is with their disappeared Imam.  Sunnis believe that a particular verse written on a leaf was eaten up by a goat.  

The hadith writers put emphassis on the time of revelation and the purpose of revelation which amounts to restricting the message to a particular condition or situation.  This is a clear violation and contradicts the very purpose of the Quran.  The fact is that the message of the Qur’an is so broad that it can be applied to one’s life regardless of time, region, cultures, race etc. till the Day of Judgement.

Bukhari did not explain many Chapters (Surahs), completely ignoring them in his 'Sahih' Bukhari. The Shiias on the other hand believe that nobody can understand Qur’an except (Ahl e Bait) so their hadiths consists of Ahl e Bait and their Imams. This is another illogical approach accepted by Sunnis and Shiias and it is clear contradiction of the Quranic message and principle. The message of the Quran which is the words of God Almighty clearly teaches us that the Qur’an is easy to understand which provide all the details and He has not omitted anything from His final Message.  But still the Sunnis and Shiias insist that the Qur’an is the summary and the details are provided in hadith books.   It doesn't even strike them that this concept is itself a huge blasphemy! The majority of Sunnis and Shiias have no shame and fear rejecting the words of God for the love of their wordly gods.

Whenever Sunnis and Shiias hear of hadith critisizm, the common question they shoot out is to show them where performing Salat is mentioned in the Qur’an. The Salat which is the most common practice is also corrupted by these hadith writers who had included lots of methods for saying Salat (Prayers).  With all the corruption brought in Islam by the imams who erased so many correct information and replaced it with their lies, at present for us there is no way to find out  exactly how the Prophet Muhammad performed his prayers, thanks to these moron hadith writers.

[For our readers' reference - if you want to know why the Glorious Quran does not specify the method of salaat in detail, please check our earlier post HERE]

Being a Muslm and following the message of the Qur’an is very easy.   But following the fabricated, contridictory and confusing hadiths of the Shiias and Sunnis can make it hard for one to remain a practicing Muslim.

These hadith writers had included lots of stories which describes animosity between the closest companions of Prophet Muhammad including his wives, daughter and grand- sons which all are lies when comparing them with the message of Qur’an. The following one verse is more than enough to reject all these disgusting fabricated stories. The Prophet Muhammad's closest companions spent 23 years under his leadership and training.  They could not and did not begin to fight each other over power after the death of the Prophet.

Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves. Thou (O Muhammad) seest them bowing and falling prostrate (in worship), seeking bounty from Allah and (His) acceptance. The mark of them is on their foreheads from the traces of prostration. Such is their likeness in the Torah and their likeness in the Gospel - like as sown corn that sendeth forth its shoot and strengtheneth it and riseth firm upon its stalk, delighting the sowers - that He may enrage the disbelievers with (the sight of) them. Allah hath promised, unto such of them as believe and do good works, forgiveness and immense reward.  48:29

The hadith writers are the main cause of dividing Muslims into sects with their facbricated stories for the successor of Prophet Muhammad. According to the corrupted hadiths Aisha (Prophet Muhammad wife) and Ali (Prophet Muhammad cousin and his son in law) had the bloody military confrontation.  Because of the hadith, the Islamic history has also gotten corrupted to a large extent and we cannot trust what is written simply because it is clear contradiction of the Quranic message. Anybody who believe that Ali and Aisha fought a war reflects that that person is ignoring the Message of God Almighty and has not learned anything from Prophet Muhammad. Anyone who believes that Abu Bakr, Omer Farouk, Uthman and Ali were obsessed to grab power immediately after the death of Prophet Muhammad need to read and understand the above verse 48:29.

The hadith writers also included hadiths related to the private married life of Prophet Muhammad and such hadiths clearly insult the Prophet. These stories are absurd and  gossipy, and not necessary for the Faith.

Now, here are few examples of hadiths from 'Sahih' Bukhari.  Read and enjoy the "science" of hadiths. No person in their right mind will find any science in these stories. These stories are illogical, vulgar and pathetic fairy tales and comedies!

Prophet Moses beat stone.  Volume 1, Book 5, Number 277: Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, ‘The (people of) Bani Israel used to take bath naked (all together) looking at each other. The Prophet Moses used to take a bath alone. They said, ‘By Allah! Nothing prevents Moses from taking a bath with us except that he has a scrotal hernia.’ So once Moses went out to take a bath and put his clothes over a stone and then that stone ran away with his clothes. Moses followed that stone saying, “My clothes, O stone! My clothes, O stone! till the people of Bani Israel saw him and said, ‘By Allah, Moses has got no defect in his body. Moses took his clothes and began to beat the stone.” Abu Huraira added, “By Allah! There are still six or seven marks present on the stone from that excessive beating.”

Prophet Moses spoiled the eye of Angel of death with slap.  Volume 2, Book 23, Number 423: Narrated Abu Huraira: The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.” Allah restored his eye and said, “Go back and tell him (i.e. Moses) to place his hand over the back of an ox, for he will be allowed to live for a number of years equal to the number of hairs coming under his hand.” (So the angel came to him and told him the same). Then Moses asked, “O my Lord! What will be then?” He said, “Death will be then.” He said, “(Let it be) now.” He asked Allah that He bring him near the Sacred Land at a distance of a stone’s throw. Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) said, “Were I there I would show you the grave of Moses by the way near the red sand hill.”

Drink camel milk and urgine as medine. No. 235 – Narrated Abu Qilaba:  Anas said, “Some people of ‘Ukl or ‘Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they went as directed and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of the Prophet and drove away all the camels. The news reached the Prophet early in the morning and he sent (men) in their pursuit and they were captured and brought at noon. He then ordered to cut their hands and feet (and it was done), and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, They were put in ‘Al-Harra’ and when they asked for water, no water was given to them.” Abu Qilaba said, “Those people committed theft and murder, became infidels after embracing Islam and fought against Allah and His Apostle.

Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:  Narrated Qatada:  Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven).

O Sunnis and Shiias!  These are only few of examples of your "science" of hadith collection by the morons knowns as Imams.  


[As an appreciative reader of this article rightly contributed a prize comment which is worth sharing]

"It is unlikely that Bukhari’s selection could have been anything but subjective.

To analyse 600,000 hadiths withing 16 years suggests the following impossible scenario:

37,500 hadiths per year = 3,125 per month = 104.66 per day

30 days in a month = 8.68 hadith per hour (assuming a 12 hour day).

No breaks for meals, 5 times prayer, no washroom breaks, no public holidays, sick days, etc.  The horrifying brutality, horrible statements against women, scientific blunders, silly legends all point to a very foolish and gullible editor who selected hadiths rapidly according to his personal taste and whim and called this ‘science’. Shame on anyone who believes any of these hadiths are not suspect!"


THEREFORE, FOLKS!  THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT GUIDANCE COMES ONLY AND ONLY FROM THE GLORIOUS QURAN.  ANY OTHER SOURCE OF GUIDANCE YOU MAY CHOOSE WOULD AMOUNT TO PLAIN DISOBEDIENCE TO THE COMMAND OF ALLAH ALMIGHTY.  ANY OTHER BOOK YOU TRY TO COMBINE WITH THE GLORIOUS QURAN WOULD AMOUNT TO PATHETIC SHIRK.  THE GLORIOUS QURAN IS A STANDALONE BOOK AND IT IS FULLY EXPLAINED.  IT DOES NOT DEPEND ON ANY OTHER BOOK FOR ITS EXPLANATION.  PERIOD.  

Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath revealed unto you (this) Scripture, fully explained ?  6:114

If thou obeyedst most of those on earth they would mislead thee far from Allah's way. They follow naught but an opinion, and they do but guess.  6:116

[Heba E. Husseyn]

Fantastic piece, just my kinda stuff    I'm glad that nowadays more and more people are coming forward and speaking up against this disgraceful culture of hadith with specific references from the Noble Quran.   Such exposures of the truth would be impossible to expect about 40 or 50 yrs ago.  I especially like the way this author mentioned that there's no "science" in such stupid writings.  Just imagine, calling this "science" .... in that case science would be the most fictional subject with this world being a very different place today.  And yes, the hadith is a big antagonist.  It's job is to divide Muslims into sects and make them fight & hate other sects.  The hadith is solely responsible for instigating the shiias into hating Aishah by making up stories about her so-called animosity with Fatimah Zahra and Ali.  and also making up that quack story that she led a campaign against Ali from Medinah to Kufah called battle of camels.  Of course this story comes from both sunni and shiia hadiths, each one putting forth their own views of lies.  Many of these battles squabbled about in hadiths are not found in any good books of history.
Thanks sister.