Making Up the Story of Human Evolution

[Zeynab]

By Harun Yahya 


The myth of human evolution

The story of "human evolution" has been based on the existence of plenty of fossils on which evolutionists are able to build up imaginary interpretations. Although only 120 ape species live on earth today, yet throughout history more than 6,000 ape species had existed before becoming extinct. These species have constituted a rich resource for a story that had never taken place.
Evolutionists wrote the scenario of human evolution by arranging some of the skulls that suited their purpose in an order from the smallest to the biggest, while scattering the skulls of some extinct human races among them. According to this scenario, humans and today's apes are said to have common ancestory.

However, the fossil record indicates to us that throughout history, humans have been humans and apes have been apes. Some of the fossils the evolutionists claim to be those of human ancestory, actually belong to human races that lived until as recently as 10,000 years ago before they disappeared. Moreover, many human communities still living today have the same physical appearance and characteristics as these extinct human races, which further proves that humans have never gone through an evolutionary process at any period in history.


The myth of human evolution is based on no
scientific findings whatsoever. Representations such as this
have no other significance than reflecting evolutionists'
imaginative wishful thinking.


To continue reading this very interesting and useful article, click here

[Heba]

Indeed this is a very well written article, thoroughly professional and properly researched .. in fact some of the terms and descriptions are a bit too pro for commoners to understand.  Actually, even among the scientific and literary circles, the evolutionary theory has now largely been discredited.  The flaws are too many considering the multitude of guesswork.  In that link, if you read the comments, a reader has mentioned just that.  She wrote that the only piece of evidence in the theory of evolution is presumption.  Couldn't agree more.

But what surprises me about Harun Yahya is that the man has written quite a lot of stuff very intelligently with rational analysis.  But he's never even attempted to analyse the history of Hadith which is no less shaky than babblings on evolution.  Not to mention, Hadith is singlely responsible for ruining the good reputation of Islam.  So, I wonder why he never comments on the infamous culture of bungling quotes as very commonly practiced by Hadith writers.  Why does he accept such writings blindly?  Harun Yahya staunchly believes in the return of Jesus and Mahdi.  If you visit his website (http://www.harunyahya.com), he says on this issue that the Quran has said that Jesus didn't die.  And then he goes on to say that this is supported by Hadith, hinting on those hadith narrations that mention about the return of Jesus.  So you see, how he tries to mislead people by his acceptance of Hadith that does not support the Quran?  The truth of the matter is that the Quran says that Jesus son of Mary did not die on the cross, and that the Almighty Allah made him (Jesus) ascend to the Heavens.  The Quran does not say anything else on this aspect.  And this in no way implies that Jesus will return.  That idea has crept into the Hadith from the Bible. 

Such tactics of Yahya Harun has kinda made me lose trust in him.  He only talks about those matters which he knows will not put him at odds with the mainstream clergy. 

If he writes something sensible about a specific issue, I give him the credit for it.  But I don't wanna generalize on his wisdom.